1、投稿方式：在线投稿。

2、官网网址：https://academic.oup.com/gastro

（微信公众号信息）

3、投稿系统：https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gr

4、联系邮箱：

mkang@gastrorep.org（微信公众号信息）

kgan@gastrorep.org（官网信息）

6、出刊日期：双月刊，逢双月出版。

7、官方微信公众号：胃肠学术平台（zslyqkzx）

2026年1月29日星期四

Author guidelines

【官网信息】

Scope

Gastroenterology

Report is an international open access (OA) journal covering all areas

related to gastrointestinal sciences, including studies of the

alimentary tract, liver, biliary, pancreas, enteral nutrition and

related fields. The journal aims to publish high quality research

articles on both basic and clinical gastroenterology, authoritative

reviews that bring together new advances in the field, as well as

commentaries and highlight pieces that provide expert analysis of

topical issues.

How we publish

Gastroenterology

Report is a peer-reviewed fully open access journal that publishes one

issue per year online. All papers published in the Journal are made

freely available online under open access publishing agreements, with

applicable charges. Please refer to the open access section below.

After copyediting and review of the final proof, papers are published in the currently open volume.

Submitting

Publishing

in Gastroenterology Report means that you are publishing with Oxford

University Press (OUP), a not-for-profit publisher and a department of

the University of Oxford. Learn more about how publishing with OUP

reinvests in the scholarly community on the OUP For Authors page.

After

preparing your manuscript according to the guidance in the Preparing

your manuscript section, you can submit your work through the Journal’s

online submission site. If you have not used our submission site before,

you will need to create an account. Additional help and instructions

are available on the submission site as you go through the process.

Please contact us with any questions about submitting your manuscript.

Article types

Articles

come under one of seven article types. Each manuscript is composed of

main document, figure files (if applicable), and supplementary material

(if applicable). Depending on the article type of your paper, please

include the following components in the main documents. All article

types undergo the Journal's standard peer review process unless

otherwise stated.

Original articles

A

complete, comprehensive report of clinical, basic, or translational

study. Structured abstract (no more than 270 words); keywords (4–6

words); main text (no more than 7,500 words); authors’ contributions;

acknowledgements; funding; conflict of interest; references; figure

legends; tables.

Meta analysis or Systematic review

Structured

abstract (no more than 270 words, including background; objectives;

data sources; study eligibility criteria, participants, and

interventions; study appraisal and synthesis methods; results;

limitations; conclusions and implications of key findings; systematic

review registration number); keywords (4–6 words); main text (no more

than 7,500 words); authors’ contributions; acknowledgements; funding;

conflict of interest; references; figure legends; tables.

Reviews

A

comprehensive analysis and/or synthesis of any specific topics.

Unstructured abstract (no more than 270 words); keywords (4–6 words);

main text (no more than 10,000 words); authors’ contributions;

acknowledgements; funding; conflict of interest; references; figure

legends; tables.

Brief reports

Including,

but being not limited to, a description of unique or rare cases, novel

treatments such as surgery and medicine, special findings in pathologic,

imaging, or endoscopic examinations, techniques or mechanistic

insights, and new animal models of human diseases. No abstract or

keywords; main text (no more than 1,000 words); acknowledgements;

funding; conflict of interest; references (no more than 10); the title

and legend of one figure or one table (if applicable).

Consensus

Unstructured

abstract (no more than 270 words); keywords (4–6 words); main text;

acknowledgements; conflict of interest information; references; figure

legends; tables.

Editorials

Invited

only. No abstract or keywords; main text (no more than 1,000 words);

acknowledgements; conflict of interest; references (no more than 10);

the title and legend of one figure or one table (if applicable).

Editorials are reviewed by Editors and are not sent for external peer

review.

Commentary

No

abstract or keywords; main text (no more than 1,000 words);

acknowledgements; conflict of interest information; references (no more

than 10); figure legend (no more than one figure); table (no more than

one table).

Letter to the Editor

Comment

on GR articles online published in the last six months. No abstract or

keywords; main text (no more than 1,000 words); conflict of interest;

references (no more than 10); figures and tables are not permitted.

Peer review process

The

Journal operates single-anonymized peer review, meaning that the

identity of the authors is known to the editors and to the reviewers,

but that the reviewers’ identities are known only to the editors and are

hidden from the authors.

During peer review, reviewers communicate directly with the editors but not the authors or other reviewers.

Once

a submitted manuscript passes initial assessment by the Journal’s

Editor-in-Chief, it will then be passed to a handling editor, who will

oversee peer review and recommend a final decision. The Editor-in-Chief

makes the final decision on the submitted manuscript.

Editors

and reviewers must not handle manuscripts if they have a conflict of

interest with an author or the content. Editors make every effort to

avoid potential conflicts of interest in the assignment of other editors

and peer reviewers. For more information, please see the section on

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. During the peer review

phase, your manuscript is typically sent to two reviewers.

You

may suggest potential reviewers at submission. However, there is no

guarantee the suggested reviewers will be selected by the Journal.

Recommended reviewers should be experts in their field and able to

provide an objective assessment of your manuscript without financial or

interpersonal conflicts of interest with any authors. We encourage you

to consider reviewers from a diverse range of backgrounds, including

those from under-represented communities.

At

the time of submission, you may request that specific individuals not

be used as reviewers of your manuscript. Please do so in your cover

letter, along with a brief explanation as to why you want them excluded.

However, there is no guarantee these individuals will be excluded by

the Journal.

Statistical

methods should be rigorous, and reporting of statistical findings

should be accurate and complete. Editors may request an expert

statistical review of any submission containing statistical analysis.

If

your manuscript is accepted for publication, no information about the

review process or editorial decision process is published, unless one of

the authors has a role on the journal. See the Disclosure of potential

conflicts of interest section for more information in that case.

For full details about the peer review process, see Fair editing and peer review.

Manuscript transfers

In

some cases, the editorial team of the Journal may offer you the option

of transferring your manuscript to Journal of the Canadian Association

of Gastroenterology (JCAG). If you accept this offer, the manuscript

files and any reviewer reports from consenting reviewers will be sent to

Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (JCAG). The

editorial team of Journal of the Canadian Association of

Gastroenterology (JCAG) may choose to seek additional peer review. A

decision will be made on the manuscript based on the feedback from all

reviewers and the judgment of the Journal of the Canadian Association of

Gastroenterology (JCAG) editorial team.

Screening for misconduct

Manuscripts

may be screened using iThenticate to help detect publication misconduct

including plagiarism and redundant publication.

Manuscripts

may also be screened, including with services provided by third

parties, to help detect integrity issues such as inappropriate image

alteration and papermill activity.

Appeals and complaints

Authors

may appeal an editorial decision. To do so, please contact the

editorial office at kgan@gastrorep.org, providing as much specific

detail as possible about why the original decision should be

reconsidered. Every appeal will receive a response within a reasonable

timeframe. Please do not resubmit your manuscript in the interim.

To

register a complaint regarding non-editorial decisions, the Journal’s

policies and procedures, editors, or staff, please contact

Journals.Ethics@oup.com. Complaints will be taken seriously and will be

carried forward following COPE guidelines and processes.

Publication and research ethics

Authorship

Authorship

is limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the

design and execution of the work described. Any contributors whose

participation does not meet the criteria for authorship should be

acknowledged but not listed as an author. The Journal will contact all

listed authors at the point of submission to confirm their role. For a

detailed definition of authorship, please see the International

Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) definitions of authors and

contributors.

The

Journal does not allow ghost authorship, where an unnamed author

prepares the article with no credit, or guest/gift authorship, where an

author who made little or no contribution is listed as an author. The

Journal follows Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidance on

ghost, guest, or gift authorship. For more information, please see the

OUP Publication Ethics page.

Natural

language processing tools driven by artificial intelligence (AI) do not

qualify as authors, and the Journal will screen for them in author

lists. The use of AI (for example, to help generate content or images,

write code, process data, or for translation) should be disclosed both

in cover letters to editors and in the Methods or Acknowledgements

section of manuscripts. Please see the COPE position statement on

Authorship and AI for more details.

Authorship changes

After

manuscript submission, no authorship changes (including the authorship

list, author order, and who is designated as the corresponding author)

should be made unless there is a substantive reason to do so. The editor

and all co-authors must agree on the change(s), and neither the Journal

nor the publisher mediates authorship disputes. If individuals cannot

agree on the authorship of a submitted manuscript, contact the editorial

office at kgan@gastrorep.org. The dispute must be resolved among the

individuals and their institution(s) before the manuscript can be

accepted for publication. If an authorship dispute or change arises

after a paper is accepted, contact OUP’s Author Support team. COPE

provides guidance for authors on resolving authorship disputes.

After

submission, changing who is designated as the corresponding author will

be permitted only where there is a substantive reason to do so. For the

avoidance of doubt, changing the corresponding author in order to

access Read and Publish funding is not permissible. For more information

on Read and Publish funding, see the Open access charges section.

......

更多详见：

https://academic.oup.com/gastro/pages/author-guidelines#section-16